Threat status of species and how activities or pressures may affect the threat status
Unit
i
The unit(s) of measurement applicable to the metric.
: IUCN Red List category, Red List Index (RLI)
Indicator
i
Indicators were developed by WBCSD. Learn more on the Methodology page.
: Species extinction risk
Metric type
i
The category of nature-related metrics. Learn more on the Methodology page.
: State
Framework alignment notes
i
The details of a metric’s alignment to each framework, including where the same or similar metric can be found within the listed framework.
ESRS E4-5 40d (i)
GBF Target 4, Target 5
Target example
i
An example target and the target source are presented to illustrate how a target could be set for this metric. Learn more on the Methodology page.
[Company name] will have zero conversion of [specify relevant threatened species] habitat in [target location(s)] by [2025, or earliest post-2025 date], compared with a 2020* cutoff year
(* While the cutoff date of 2020 and the goal of no conversion is aligned both to science and international commitments and policies, the target date may differ based on implementation hurdles and local context.)
Target source: Adapted from SBTN Land Target
Sector
i
Each metric applies to one sector.
Energy
Value chain stage
i
Each metric applies to one or more stages of the value chain aligned with the associated actions.
Raw MaterialsManufacturing
Metric assessment
i
The relevance and feasibility scores were determined by WBCSD member companies. Learn more on the Methodology page.
Relevance:Medium
Feasibility:Low
Related actions
i
The other actions that the metric is mapped to.
Develop and implement sourcing guidelines that prioritize sustainable commodities and suppliers committed to sustainable practices
Avoid harmful activities during times of vulnerability for key and threatened local species