Running the risk - Risk and sustainable development: a business perspective
As individuals, we all have different attitudes to the risks of everyday life. Those
attitudes have changed significantly over the generations as society has become more
inter-connected. Globalization has prompted a shift in our concerns about risk from
‘local’ to ‘global’; indeed, as we enter the 21st century, we are faced with mega risks of
a kind that society has never previously had to deal with.
The way corporations view risk has changed in the same way. There is a new
recognition among companies that the achievement of their objectives depends on
being able to deal with risks of a more ‘systemic’ nature. These are risks that cannot be
tackled in isolation from each other, and which need to be addressed through an
alliance of business and society working in unison. Achieving sustainable development
falls squarely into this category.
While corporate actions in meeting
societal needs for goods and services
undoubtedly contribute to risk, the
adoption of sustainable development
strategies by businesses can actively
contribute to avoiding risk or
minimizing adverse impacts.
The challenge for the corporate sector is
to understand how different sources
and magnitude of risk are likely to affect
them over the long term. In order to
gain that understanding, companies
need to take a genuinely holistic
approach that includes a consideration
of sustainability as well as commercial,
political and societal risks. They also
need to find ways of assessing,
managing and sharing risk in
collaboration with stakeholders, business
partners and other responsible bodies.
Looking to the future
The new mega risks we face present
unprecedented challenges to
businesses and governments alike.
Energy use and its potential impact on
climate change, for example, is
something that requires co-ordinated
action on a global scale. Meanwhile,
the world’s population continues to
grow, raising issues about the shape of
future markets and the viability of social
support systems and the consequent
affects for society and business.
Getting the response to risk wrong may
result in serious difficulties for business
that quickly spiral out of control.
Corporate reputations can be destroyed
in a matter of days, especially in cases
where companies depend on intangible
rather than physical assets. Globalization
compounds these risks still further since
the world has become a place where
there is ‘nowhere to hide’.
Political upheavals, terrorism,
cross-border litigation, environmental
pressures and health pandemics are just some of the other mega risks that face
the corporate sector. Dealing with them
requires far-sightedness and innovation.
It also calls for an appreciation that, while
many risks have local origins, their
impact may rapidly become global.
Developing an effective
response
The traditional approach to risk has been
fragmented, largely reactive and focused
on the short term. Because risk is
multi-dimensional, managers tend to
associate it with loss, rather than weighing
up the downsides against the upsides.
Recognizing that responding to the new
risk environment requires more than just
risk assessment alone, forward-looking
organizations have developed
‘enterprise’ approaches to risk. As the
name suggests, this involves bringing
previously disparate roles and activities
into a unified framework. The result is a
structured yet practical risk management
approach which is aligned with the
business and therefore makes the
organization better able to co-ordinate its
risk management activities.
Companies that truly embed this
approach within their organizational
behavior come closest to achieving the
‘holy grail’ of risk management: that is,
embracing risk management as a
business enabler rather than as a
compliance-driven ‘necessary evil’ .
They assign roles and responsibilities for
risk management throughout the
organization, creating company-wide
awareness of and accountability for risk
management.
The result is an approach to risk which
moves well beyond the mere use of
controls to limit risk exposure. Instead, it
creates risk optimization and even risk
leadership – the process by which an
organization is able to seize opportunities
within defined risk parameters and capitalize on the rewards that follow.
Such a strategic approach is essential to
managing mega risk and achieving
sustainable development.
Adopting a new approach
The challenges inherent in developing
new approaches to risk are increasingly
interchangeable with the sustainability
agenda. Consequently, the issues that
have to be faced are as applicable to
governments and individuals as they are
to companies.
From the CEO’s point of view, however,
the first task is to develop a wider
appreciation of risk within his or her
organization; mega risks need to be
identified and understood, and people
have to be encouraged to ‘think the
unthinkable’. The next step is to ensure
a focus on the long term, underpinned
by meaningful consideration of the risks
that need to be addressed to secure
corporate sustainability.
Companies should make sure that their
‘appetite’ for risk is clearly defined and
communicated throughout the
organization. This gives employees the
confidence to take decisions within a
known framework in which flair and
appropriate risk-taking are encouraged.
At the same time, risk management
needs to be seen as a decision-making
tool that facilitates rather than stifles the
entrepreneurial approach – risks present
opportunities, not just problems.
Finally, there needs to be a recognition that the most effective risk management
is likely to require engagement with all the organization’s stakeholders. The
performance of customers and suppliers is inextricably linked with the performance
of the company itself. Anticipating, accommodating and exploiting the way in
which all stakeholders are affected by risk is central to the organization’s
long-term prosperity and survival.
Download

 |
 |
 |
 |
| Author |
 |
 |
WBCSD |
 |
 |
 |
| Publication Date |
 |
 |
18 Mar 2004 |
 |
 |
 |
| Document Type |
 |
 |
Publications
|
 |
 |
 |
| Issue/Topic |
 |
 |
Business Role/CSR
|
 |
 |
 |
| Source |
 |
 |
WBCSD
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Back to results
|